●Open to Technical Program Manager roles · Remote or relocation
A decade owning safety-critical technical programs in Marine aviation, then six years running operations in payments and consumer products. I find the constraint holding the schedule and remove it, and the systems I build are AI-first: they keep running, and keep getting faster, long after I leave.
What order looks like
15.1%
36 mo
90 days
3.4%
while inbound volume grew 400%
Under attack
chargebacks down 32% alongside
Empty floor
in under a year
Eight years in Marine aviation logistics. Six running operations. Two companies founded. Three bestselling novels. Zero failed audits in fourteen years.
Principles
I write down what got decided, who has it, and when it lands. Then I go get it. Things rarely fail because nobody knew. They fail because nobody was watching the date.
Anyone can roll out a tracker. The test is whether it is still running in month six, after the novelty wears off and the first person tries to route around it. Mine have been.
I handle what I can handle. If I am bringing it to you, there is a reason, and I will have already done the work to make the decision a short one.
I read a P&L and a hazard communication plan with the same attention. Equally at home on a production floor and in a software engineering standup.
Every system I build now assumes AI in the loop: intake, tracking, documentation, and the first pass on analysis. People make the decisions. The tooling keeps the date.
I am looking for a Technical Program Manager role in safety-critical or infrastructure programs, and I still take consulting engagements. Either way, the deliverable is the same: a schedule that holds, decisions that turn into shipped outcomes, and systems that keep running after I leave.